Karma in Bhagavad-Gita and Shakuntala Essay

In _Bhagavad- Gita_, dharma and karma are two controlling forces of the net destinies of the muckle to stay on and conserve the Hindu social order. Arjuna, the protagonist, is torn between two choices, either to practice his dharma for the emancipation of the olf dissembleion or to fight against his kin that would probably result to evil karma. He belongs to a cause position in the Hindu social order because of his birth and occupation, making him locked up from the supposed ultimate freedom (Mack, 1995). The dharma of Arjuna complicates his status in the social hierarchy thus makes him doubtful in acting his duties and responsibilities both as a Hindu warrior and a kin. He may have the control over his spirit and he may choose to receive a good karma, only his dharma contradicts and requires him to somehow disobey his self.In addition, according to Krishna, if he will withdraw from action, it is thus an act of self-delusion and the renunciation of moral and social responsib ility. Krishna verbalise that he Arjuna must learn to endure fleeting things- they come and go (2nd teaching 14). He is convert him to fight the battle (2nd 18) and so if he has courage, he is fit for immortality (2nd 15). He is al ways reminding him that his dharma requires him to fight.He adds, No one exists for even an instant without performing action however unwilling, every being is forced to act by the qualities of record (3rd 5). Arjunas hesitation may be valid in some points still it is orderly since it is human nature. He is overcome by doubts because he does not wish to be nefarious of the death of his kin, but Krishna tell him that actions imprisons the world unless it is done as sacrifice freed from bail bond, Arjuna, perform action as sacrifice (3rd 9).From the philosophies of Krishna mentioned above, it can be scrutinized that an individual in the Indian society must not sound off that performing dharma can be immoral once it may result to evil karma, but earli er internalize that when performing deeds, always perform with detachment any action you mustdo performing action with detachment, one achieves supreme good (3rd 19). They are not ruling dharma and karma, but they govern to preserve the world (3rd 25)._Shakuntala_ also portrays a strong Hindu society and Hinduism. There is sadness and melancholy refer equal to dharma and karma but the ultimate destinies are well-controlled. Hinduism may provide sufficient free will to man but it does not permit him grappling from the moral ambiguities that may lead to tragedy (Yohannan, 1994).Shakunta was punished because she did not able to perform her religious duties. As what Priyamvada told the King, Shakuntala has been engaged in the practiced of religious duties but because of her fascination and attachment to the King, she forgot her dharma for the first time, leading her to suffer evil consequences (karma). Priyamvada told her assumption to Anasuya when they were in the garden of the hermi tage and said I fear a terrible misfortune has occurred.Sakoontala, from absence of mind, must have offended some guest whom she was terminal point to treat with respect. Shakuntala is the daughter of the hermit leader and a Brahman so she really has to perform her religious duties new(prenominal)wise she will disobey the norm. Nevertheless, she is not destined to be forever shattered and missed she must gain back what and who she deserves to have, and that is to be united with the King.Through the presentation of the fate of the characters, we can swan that Hinduism still favors people as long as they keep their faith and deeds according to it.For the straits _how can be both paradoxical and at the same time complementary, Shakuntala_ and _Bhagavad- Gita_ have their own ways of portraying an Indian society and its religion. In _Bhagavad- Gita,_ Krishna is really the personal and true-existing (though appeared in a different form) adviser who keeps on reminding and convincing Arjuna to perform his dharma otherwise a great consequence might happen. Arjuna tends to remain in his humanness nature but his dharma tries to desolate him from his morality,so there is his friend charioteer (Krishna) who keeps on warning him by teaching philosophies. He is overcome by his morality by killing his own kin. On the other hand, Shakuntala has not been warned before she committed such sacred crime. She was more overcome by the humanness nature that she tends to forget her dharma. Her emotions desolate her, so as punishment, her own fault kills the chance to be loved by the King.Because of their social status in the society, their dharma becomes more demanding and regulating. Both show a pleasurable sense of life story and their religion guides them not to end up tragically. Both value knowledge as means to salvation and liberation. In _Shakuntala,_ the trial which she brings upon herself matures her in the knowledge of love and prepares her for the life which she is destined to live (Yohannan, 1994). In _Bhagavad- Gita_, knowledge is obscured (3rd 39), therefore Krishna tells Arjuna that kill this evil that wins knowledge and judgment (3rd 41) because knowing the self beyond understanding scram the self with the self (3rd43)